Laboratory assessment by combined z score values in proficiency tests: experience gained through the European Union proficiency tests for pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables
P. Medina-Pastor, M. Mezcua, C. Rodríguez-Torreblanca and A. R. Fernández-Alba.
ANAL BIOANAL CHEM. DOI 10.1007/s00216-010-3877-3.
Author Keywords
Z score, Proficiency test, Multiresidue method, Combined z score, Pesticide, Fruit and vegetables, Performance, Weighted.
Abstract
The obligation for accredited laboratories to participate in proficiency tests under ISO 17025, performing multiresidue methods (MRMs) for pesticide residues, involves the reporting of a large number of individual z scores making the evaluation of the overall performance of the laboratories difficult. It entails, time and again, the need for ways to summarise the laboratory's overall assessment into a unique combined index. In addition, the need for ways to continually evaluate the performance of the laboratory over the years is equally acknowledged. For these reasons, following 14 years of the European Union Reference Laboratory for Pesticide Residues in Fruits and Vegetables (EUPT-FV), useful formulas have been designed to globally evaluate the assessment of the participating laboratories. The aim is to achieve a formula which is easy to nderstand, which can be applied and which fits the purposes of long-term evaluation detecting positive and negative trends. Moreover, consideration is needed for a fair compensation of bad results in MRM, taking into account the large number of compounds that are covered. It is therefore important to be aware of the difficulties in getting satisfactory values from a wide range of compounds. This work presents an valuation of the main well-established combined z score formulas together with those new ones developed here which have been applied to the European proficiency test results (EUPTs) over the years. Previous formulas such as the rescaled sum of z score (RSZ), the sum squared of zscore (SSZ) and the relative laboratory performance (RLP)
are compared with the newer ones: the sum of weighted zscores (SWZ) and the sum of squared z scores (SZ2). By means of formula comparisons, conclusions on the advantages, drawbacks and the most fit-for-purpose approach are achieved.
© ANAL BIOANAL CHEM. All rights reserved.
If you want to obtain the full text document, please contact with us:
Octavio Malato: omalato@ual.es (+34) 950 214 423
Carmen Ferrer: cferrer@ual.es (+34) 950 014 102
Published 29-06-2010, 12:03:58
Share: 
